Ending the Cycle of Recurring Attacks on Customs Operatives (1)
Ending the Cycle of Recurring Attacks on Customs Operatives (1)
BY
EGUONO ODJEGBA
Today,
let us look at the spate of clashes between officers and men of the Nigeria
Customs Service and ‘indigenes’ of border communities at the Seme-Badagry,
Idiroko-Owode axis in Lagos and Ogun state.
Whereas
clashes can be forgiven in the routine wrangling between customs operatives and
citizens in violation of customs law, which in any case appears to be a
universal phenomenon, mob attacks on customs operatives, which are occasionally
lethal and often dispensed with a sense of righteous indignation, clearly stamp
out those involved as pitiably ignorant.
The
recent of such attacks at Owode (Yewa) Community in Ogun State in January this
year, can safely be tagged an act of terrorism however we chose to look at it.
Available evidences indicate that the attack was premeditated, going by the
reported massive cooperation of criminal elements in the community.
Without
mincing words, attacks on the customs operatives who are carrying out their
legitimate customs enforcement duty against acts of smuggling, also amount to
attacks on the federal government and people of Nigeria. And it is by no means
a small offense, it is a crime against the state; with prospects of agonizing
jail term for those found culpable.
Recall
that this incident is following on the heel of earlier attacks at Asero
Community of the state, where smugglers reportedly killed an operative identified as Customs Assistant 1 Hamisu Sani, and seriously
injured another. The story is not so different at the Seme-Badagry axis, which
also records intermittent economic violence.
This
time the customs operatives had embarked on a sting operation at a hideout in Yewa
community, where vehicles laden with suspected smuggled rice had taken
temporary cover. The Ogun Customs Command Public Relations Officer, Abdullahi
Maiwada in a statement said the smugglers and their accomplices engaged the
customs operatives in confrontation which reportedly led to exchange of fire.
The
import here is that the attackers were with fire arms, although no customs
officers life was lost here, Maiwada said two were seriously injured with
others sustaining various degrees of injuries. According to him, the hoodlums
also destroyed official patrol vehicles.
The
spokesman further explained that even though his men upon noticing the
escalating atmosphere sought to avoid mortality by attempting to beat a
retreat, “the hoodlums took law into their hands by barricading the main road
leading to Idiroko, scouting for Customs Officers to attack.”
Although
some of the community leaders attempted to play the victim game by explaining
that they were ‘booked’ by some officers and ultimately ‘passed’ when they
arrived with the smuggled items, our source became hostile when our reporter
asked if he had any receipt to show for the said transaction. The claim that
they ‘paid’ some officers following which, the said officers granted them
passage of way, only to allegedly trail them afterwards, is as defective a defence
as it is stupid. Such ranting is not only strange to law; it further emphasizes
their culpability in compromising officers.
But
that is story for another day. These attacks are unbecoming and perhaps, it is
time the federal government take steps to look into the matter and seek an end
to the hostilities and death.
Instructively,
this case between customs and citizens is purely economic. While the customs
officer in keeping with his mandate strive to safeguard the national economy
from saboteurs in the guise of smugglers, the citizens strives to eke out a
living through unlawful economic means. While the affected citizen engages in
smuggling, the customs officer tries to stop and recover the smuggled items,
and at the very worst, recover the items and arrest the smuggler.
Both
are in mutual economic activities, but whereas one is going against the law,
the other tries to enforce the law. They both operate between thin lines.
Border community people in the state have for a long time already, assumed that
smuggling is their birthright; their mineral resources and oil field, their
contract allocation offices, their port system, their birthright trade, their
livestock industry.
Birthright
and a way of life in the sense that they were born into the smuggling trade and,
wrong or right, the belief that it is the only official economic activity in
the vast border fringe of the state. As if to state their conviction, the
citizens say there are no industries and no enough civil service employment to
absorb even one tenth of the productive population. Of farming, they have sad
tales to tell, ranging from increasing non availability of fertile farmlands,
to lack of government support and encouragement.
Here
we are confronted with a tricky and dicey situation about our economic state
function and citizens resort to economic self help. We are confronted with the
dictate of law which is sacrosanct and the allure of survival within the
framework of slippery social justice.
But
we are talking about the sanctity of lives, which these confrontations
engender. The customs is recording death, so are the border communities; the
urgent and critical intervention needed at this point is halting these
confrontations through purposeful and realistic dialogue.
Every
single customs officer fell on the field of duty is a national loss. It is no
less a pain when citizens die wrongfully in avoidable confrontation with the
law. Life is sacrosanct and above every other consideration. The presidency
should show more interest in what is happening at the border communities South
West, before it degenerates to another national crisis.
There
are people who believe that a number of these confrontations are avoidable, and
therefore presupposes that deaths recorded there from could also be avoided. No
sane government is interested in the death of its citizens, least of all
through unlawful economic engagement. The relevant departments of government
including the customs service should convoke a national summit to discuss the
damning issue of official neglect in these areas, while in the interim, the
state and affected local government areas should establish a much more
formidable purposeful intervention framework.
Comments
Post a Comment